> Therefore if wicket itself can simply allow me to configure to ignore > anthing inside wicket:remove, it would be a great convenience. Otherwise, I > also want to know the reason behind why wicket prohibit wicket:id insder > wicket:remove and try to make my designers follow the necessary practice.
The thought we had about that if I remember correctly is that embedding wicket tags and tags with wicket:id would typically be an mistake from the developer, and if we would just ignore it, it might lead to bugs that are hard to track down. I understand your use case too though. Not sure how difficult this would be to implement (to just ignore the wicket tags and attributes) and to make it a setting - personally, I would be against ignoring these tags by default. You could open up a feature request for it, but it wouldn't be on the top of our list to fix tbh. Though if you would deliver a patch that would increase your chances quite a bit :) Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
