Igor Vaynberg wrote: > On 7/16/07, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> My over-arching question at this point is: Is it a requirement that a >> model's target object be Serializable? > > > no
> if validation fails the models are not updated, wicket will hold on to > input > for you and redisplay it in the form. model updates are atomic in regard to > validation. so you are ok. the only thing to worry when using db backed > beans directly is locking. martijn has a great example on how to handle > optimistic locking in the form on his blog. > see above answer. you can use an ldm and in load() return new instance > every > time. > IModel is in part to allow the dto beans to not be serializable if you do > not want them to. > > -igor Thanks much for the quick reply, Igor. OK, cool - that's good news. I'm glad I don't have to do a massive conversion to serializable. Let me try what you suggested and see how it goes. Thanks again! DR ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
