yeah. i want to, but i dont see where i'm storing values(). i'll keep
looking. must be somewhere.
thanks a lot,
verbal
On 7/16/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/16/07, verbal evasion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is what i see. i wonder if there is a way to get a more informative
> trace. i actually think now its that i'm doing HashMap.values()
somewhere
> and its trying to serialize that, but shouldnt the values() be
serializable
> if i marked that class serializable?
Well, values is defined as this:
private class Values extends AbstractCollection<V> {
...
That class is not serializable. Serialization of HashMap works through
custom read/writeObject implementations. So it sounds like you should
try to get rid of values().
Eelco
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
