Dear Majid Yazdani.

As for the unit cell: I never did the Ce example, but you should consider how the field you applied fits into local symmetries.

As for the electronic structure changes: Apply a field B0 large enough to have g*mu_B*B0 >> E_convergence of your SCF. When you calculate the field you might want to thank Peter Blaha that fields of that size are so cheap in Wien2k. Then blow up the resolution in your DOS-plot when you look for field effects.

As for the changes in the DOS of FM and AFM phases I am not sure what exactly you mean. Experimental results or DFT calculations? Materials with a field induced magnetic transition?

Good luck

Martin Pieper


Am 10.07.2013 19:12, schrieb majid yazdani:
Dears Prof. Blaha and Martin Pieper

Thanks for your reply

I use the unit cell for my calculations. Is this similar to the electric field?

When I grep the MMTOT see that it changes. But I want to see the
electronic structure changes.

When I use this method for other cases in both FM and AFM phases that
according to the experimental results their Fermi surfaces and DOS’s
must be changed in the presence of the magnetic field I don’t see any
change.

Thanking you

M. Yazdani

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Majid Yazdani Kachoei,

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science,

University of Isfahan (UI), Hezar Gerib Avenue,

81744 Isfahan, Iran.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Peter Blaha
<pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:

And:  did you use a supercell ???

The field is of zig-zag shape to have periodic boundary conditions.

On 07/10/2013 05:06 PM, pieper wrote:
Dear Majid Yazdani,

since you indicate that you are looking for effects of the magnetic
field in the DOS, or maybe in a spaghetti band structure plot, my guess
is that you are looking in the wrong place. The energy differences are
VERY small (calculate the energy of a moment of 1 Bohr magneton in 60 T
field in Ry units). Do you see an effect in, say, the local Ce-moment?
(grep :MMI *.scf)

Best regards

Martin Pieper

Am 10.07.2013 15:54, schrieb majid yazdani:
Dear WIEN2k authors and users

I’m trying to calculate the effect of the external magnetic filed on
the electronic structure of my case.

I follow section 7.2 of the users guide and apply the 60 T external
magnetic field on the gamma-Ce as test with these input files for the
orb program:

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.inorb

3  1  0                     nmod, natorb, ipr

PRATT  1.0                  BROYD/PRATT, mixing

1 1 3                       iatom nlorb, lorb

60.

0. 0. 1.

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.indm

-9.                      Emin cutoff energy

 1                       number of atoms for which density matrix is
calculated

 1  1  3      index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1

 0 0           r-index, (l,s)index

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

And the section of the  log:

   (runsp_lapw) options: -p -i 400 -in1ef -orb -cc 0.0001

Mon Jan  2 05:14:02 IRST 2006> (x) lapw0 -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:06 IRST 2006> (x) lapw1 -up -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:08 IRST 2006> (x) lapw1 -dn -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:09 IRST 2006> (x) lapw2 -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:10 IRST 2006> (x) lapw2 -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006> (x) lapwdm -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006> (x) lapwdm -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006> (x) lcore -up

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006> (x) lcore -dn

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006> (x) mixer -orb

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

output files of the orb are:

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbup

 Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: up

 Type of potential:            Interaction with Bext

 Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

  end of OP input

        Bext=  60.00000 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

 STRUCT file read

 Bext in global crystal system   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000

 angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 deg

  natom           1

  No old potential found

 Bext in local orthogonal system   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000

 angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg

  Atom           1  spin up   potential real part (Ry)

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -3   0.00077   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -2   0.00000   0.00051   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -1   0.00000   0.00000   0.00026   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  0   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  1   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
-0.00026   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  2   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000  -0.00051   0.00000

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  3   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000  -0.00077

  Potential imaginary part (Ry)

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -3   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -2   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -1   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  0   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  1   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  2   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  3   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbdn

 Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: down

 Type of potential:            Interaction with Bext

 Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

  end of OP input

        Bext=  60.00000 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

 STRUCT file read

 Bext in global crystal system   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000

 angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 deg

  natom           1

  No old potential found

 Bext in local orthogonal system   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000

 angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg

  Atom           1  spin down potential real part (Ry)

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -3   0.00077   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -2   0.00000   0.00051   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -1   0.00000   0.00000   0.00026   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_-1   M=  0   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_-1   M=  1   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
-0.00026   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBr  1_-1   M=  2   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000  -0.00051   0.00000

:VORBr  1_-1   M=  3   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000  -0.00077

  Potential imaginary part (Ry)

:VORBi  1_-1   M= -3   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_-1   M= -2   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_-1   M= -1   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_-1   M=  0   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_-1   M=  1   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_-1   M=  2   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

:VORBi  1_-1   M=  3   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
0.00000   0.00000   0.00000

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

But I see no difference between the results in the absence and
presence of the magnetic filed.

What is the problem?

Thanking you

M. Yazdani

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Majid Yazdani Kachoei,

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science,

University of Isfahan (UI), Hezar Gerib Avenue,

81744 Isfahan, Iran.

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien [1]
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html [2]
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien [1]
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html [2]

--

                                      P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WWW:
http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/ [3]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien [1]
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
[2]



Links:
------
[1] http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
[3] http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to