Dear Kyohn,

I finally got a chance to look into your problem, and I can reproduce the behavior you describe. Without SO everything worked fine. With SO, the projection clearly went awry: The spreads were too large (~16 Ų vs ~4 Ų in the non-SO case), the centers were off, and the Wannier bandstructure was bad also. Is that what you saw?

I then tried the example on a different machine, because I had a different Wien2k version there -- I thought maybe something about SO had changed and broken the w2w procedure. There, I really did get good results, but it turns out that the key difference was the compiler and LAPACK library used for wannier90.

The problem happened when I used ‘ifort’ together with the ATLAS library. I tried various combinations of ifort/gfortran and MKL/ATLAS/netlib, but only ifort+ATLAS seems to have this problem.

Can you please try if a similar strategy works in your case?


        Elias
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to