I can not reproduce your problem, I always receive ALL columns that I ask for 
in case.inop
(indeed the number of columns in case.injoint should match)

did you change your case.inop between the steps you performed and forgot to 
change the number of choices  ?

Ciao
Gerhard

DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."

====================================
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
Johannes Gutenberg - University
55099 Mainz
and
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids
01187 Dresden
________________________________________
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von lokanath 
patra [lokanath.patra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Oktober 2017 03:18
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: Re: [Wien] Optical properties with SO coupling

Dear Karel and Hamrle,

Thank you for your reply.

I have followed the steps already you have mentioned. I used switch 6 and 
obtained the plasma frequency. Then used it in case.inkram as my system is a 
metal.  Then again I used switch 4 in case.injoint file and did the 
calculations before proceeding for x kram -up. My question is as follows:

(1)When I proceed with x joint -up (with switch 4 in case.injoint) , the 
case.outputjointup file coming as follows

#  Energy  [eV]     Im_eps_xx          Im_eps_zz

      0.00000     0.00000000E+00     0.00000000E+00
      0.01361     0.00000000E+00     0.00000000E+00
      0.02721     0.00000000E+00     0.00000000E+00
      0.04082     0.33667974E+02     0.97123076E+01
      0.05442     0.45512899E+02     0.14941513E+02
      0.06803     0.56560294E+02     0.25979180E+02
      0.08163     0.72797967E+02     0.51973076E+02
      0.09524     0.14197996E+03     0.13384727E+03
      0.10885     0.16008265E+03     0.16068757E+03
      0.12245     0.17348056E+03     0.18197670E+03
      0.13606     0.17206392E+03     0.18134116E+03
      0.14966     0.16432457E+03     0.17616364E+03
      0.16327     0.15422491E+03     0.16631451E+03
.............................................................................................

Why there is no column for xy component when my case.symmatup has all the three 
components? How to calculate epsilon or absorptivity in xy direction also?

Best Regards,
Lokanath

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Jaroslav Hamrle 
<ham...@karlov.mff.cuni.cz<mailto:ham...@karlov.mff.cuni.cz>> wrote:
Hallo,

to calculate optical properties of Ni, after calculating electronic structure 
being spin-polarized and being with spin-orbit, do:

1) create both case.inop (your file looks correct) and case.injoint

Example of case.injoint is:
==== example of case.injoint =======
    1  9999 9999              : LOWER,UPPER and (optional) UPPER-VAL BANDINDEX
   0.0000    0.00100   1.0000 : EMIN DE EMAX FOR ENERGYGRID IN ryd
eV                            : output units  eV / ryd  / cm-1
     4                        : SWITCH
     9                        : NUMBER OF COLUMNS
   0.1  0.1  0.3              : BROADENING (FOR DRUDE MODEL - switch 6,7 -
ONLY)

SWITCH:

   0...JOINTDOS FOR EACH BAND COMBINATION
   1...JOINTDOS AS SUM OVER ALL BAND COMBINATIONS
   2...DOS FOR EACH BAND
   3...DOS AS SUM OVER ALL BANDS
   4...Im(EPSILON)
   5...Im(EPSILON) for each band combination
   6...INTRABAND contributions
   7...INTRABAND contributions including band analysis
===== end example case.injoint ====

Now, you have to decide if you want to calculate optics at finer k-mesh than 
electronic structure, or the same mesh. In case electronic structure is 
calculated with k-mesh 30x30x30, it is good enough for Imxy and MOKE.

2a) when keeping the same k-mesh for optical calculations as for electronic 
structure, do:

  x lapw2 -p -fermi -up -so
  x optic -p -up -so   (your command in your email is opticc,  i.e. complex 
variant of command optic; opticc should be used when the structure lacks point 
symmetry, which Ni does not)
  x joint -up
  x kram -up

2b) when you want mesh for optical calculations to be finer, do:
  x kgen -so (to generate finer mesh)
  in third line in case.in2, change value of TETRA to be 101
  x lapw1 -p -up
  x lapw1 -p -dn
  x lapwso -up -p
  x lapw2 -p -fermi -up -so
  x optic -so -up -p
  x joint -up -p
  x kram -up


3) When using w2k version 17.1, there is a bug in the function joint when 
electronic structure is spin-polarized case with so. In this case, all optical 
constant outgoing function joint have half values for w2k ver 17.1 compared to 
previous w2k versions. So either use w2k version 16.1 or smaller, or with w2k 
version 17.1, simply multiply all optical constants by factor 2.

Hoping it helps
Best regards

Jaro



On 03/10/17 21:04, lokanath patra wrote:
Dear Wien2K experts,

I am trying to calculate the optical properties of Ni with SO coupling. I have 
prepared my case.inop file which looks like


99999 1       number of k-points, first k-point
-5.0 3.0 9999 Emin, Emax for matrix elements, NBvalMAX
3             number of choices (columns in *outmat): 2: hex or tetrag. case
1             Re xx
3             Re zz
7             Im xy
OFF           ON/OFF   writes MME to unit 4

Then I proceeded with x opticc -so -up and got the three components i.e. Re xx, 
Re zz and Im xy in case.symmatup file.

>From here, how should I proceed with the calculations so that I can get all 
>these components in the case.absorpup file after x kram -up ?

As I want to proceed with MOKE calculations, I want the xy components also. 
Please help me.

Best regards,

Lokanath

--
Lokanath Patra
Ph.D Scholar
Dept. of Physics
School of Applied and Basic Sciences
Central University of Tamil Nadu
Thiruvarur
Tamil Nadu - 610101
Ph no - +91-8675834507<tel:+91%2086758%2034507>

[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
     Virus-free. 
www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>



_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mgr. Jaroslav Hamrle, Ph.D.
Institute of Physics, room F232
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
Charles University
Ke Karlovu 5
121 16 Prague
Czech Republic

tel: +420-95155 1340
email: ham...@karlov.mff.cuni.cz<mailto:ham...@karlov.mff.cuni.cz>
------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html




--
Lokanath Patra
Ph.D Scholar
Dept. of Physics
School of Applied and Basic Sciences
Central University of Tamil Nadu
Thiruvarur
Tamil Nadu - 610101
Ph no - +91-8675834507
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to