I've never used calLa_Pre.

Apparently your lattice has fcc structure and this program does not take this into account.

It is either a programming error or an improper use of the program.

PS: Take the volume which calLa_Pre prints (352.8832 for 1 GPa), multiply by four and take the cube-root.

Sometimes problems are so difficult ...

On 03/23/2018 08:02 AM, Osama Yassin wrote:
Dear Wien2k developers and users


I have optimized the lattice geometry of a cubic NiTiSn half-Heusler alloys by using both BPE-GGA and SCAN functionals.


After obtaining the EOS I had generated structure files at different pressure values in the range from 1 to 15 GPa.


The generated lattice constant is so small and thus an error appears with nn execution (unphysical rmt value).


Here is the output of the lattice optimization done by Wien2k v17.1

  Equation of state: EOS2 (PRB52,8064)        info           2
  a,b,c,d    -17137.653776       734.841266     -5894.224839     15544.779981
  V0,B(GPa),BP,E0       355.6656       125.8716         6.1900
cubic lattice parameter:   11.2469 bohr =     5.9516 Ang
Equation of state: Murnaghan info 7
  E=E0+[B*V/BP*(1/(BP-1)*(V0/V)**BP +1)-B*V0/(BP-1)]/14703.6
  Pressure=B/BP*((V0/V)**BP -1)
  V0,B(GPa),BP,E0       355.6503       124.9491         6.2049     -17107.648797
cubic lattice parameter:   11.2468 bohr =     5.9515 Ang
          vol       energy         de(EOS2)      de(Murnaghan)  Pressure(GPa)
      338.8098   -17107.645076     0.000111     0.000093          7.072
      328.2219   -17107.637809    -0.000037    -0.000029         12.997
      352.9268   -17107.648746     0.000036     0.000040          0.984
      354.6915   -17107.648662    -0.000128    -0.000124          0.340
      356.4561   -17107.648672    -0.000122    -0.000117         -0.281
      367.0439   -17107.647560     0.000203     0.000203         -3.579
      377.6317   -17107.643718    -0.000063    -0.000066         -6.257
                   Sigma:          0.000114     0.000111

The output of the calLa_Pre for 1 GPa pressure is


  V0,B(GPa),BP       355.6503       124.9491         6.2049
  11.217986 11.217986 11.217986 90.000000 90.000000 90.000000
new Volume,Cof,b/a ratio,c/a ratio ----->        352.8832  0.250000 1.000000  1.000000
new a,b,c ----->  7.066597  7.066597  7.066597

As it can be seen from the result of the lattice optimization a pressure of 12.997 GPa is applicable to this structure.

My question why the lattice generated by calLa_Pre is so small for this structure at 1 GPa?.

O A Yassin


Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>


_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--

                                      P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/TC_Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to