Dear Prof. Blaha, dead All,

Thank you for recent answers, they solved my issues.

I have another issue on position relaxation. I looked at UG and at README_5_3 mixer document, but this didn't solve my issues. I am trying to relax a symmetric 7 monolayer slab (5 layers for MgO with single Fe atoms on both sides, 12 atoms total) using the MSR1a method. I try to run commands such as
runsp -fc 0.5 -ec 0.0001 -cc 0.001
I see atoms slightly moving in *.struct file and after some iterations I have info in the *.dayfile that MSR1a is changed to MRS in *.inm file and the cycle converges.

Now, even with -fc 0.01 I cannot get things symmetric, for Fe-O distance I keep getting around 2.139 A and 2.148 on opposite sides of the slab (optimized bulk lattice parameter of MgO is used for in-plane slab size). Is that the accuracy limit for positions? Another issue is that when I am running ferromagnetic+SOC calculation for such relaxed structure then forces (printed at the end of *.scf file) become large again. Is that OK? Should I try position optimization with SOC (should be negligible effect for Fe)?

Other questions:

- Is there a difference between *.inm and *.inM files for MSR1a position optimization?
- How can I lock some atoms in position during structure optimization?

Best,
Lukasz

--
Dr. Lukasz Plucinski
Group Leader, FZJ PGI-6
Phone: +49 2461 61 6684
https://electronic-structure.fz-juelich.de/

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to