Most importantly: You talked about a 2x2x2 supercell ???

We don't know how big your original cell was, but a 16 atome cell with 1 T is not an impurity as measured in PAC.
How many atoms are in this supercell ???

You must probably increase the supercell size and check convergence of the EFG.

On 3/18/19 1:15 PM, Stefaan Cottenier wrote:
If the goal is to have a EFG that is a predictive as possible for experiment, then it is advised to take the experimental cell parameters (but with position optimization).

If that EFG does not agree with experiment, then this is a trigger to search further. There can be many reasons (assuming both the experiment and the calculation are correctly done):

  * You have an unusually sensitive case, where small details that
    usually do not matter do affect the EFG
  * The effect of temperature might be unusually large (your calculation
    is at 0 K)
  * Maybe the Ta atom is associated with a defect (vacancy, oxygen,…)
    and the experiment measures that complex.
  * …

Stefaan

*From:*Wien <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Ramsewak Kashyap
*Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2019 12:41 PM
*To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

atomic positions  optimization means force relaxation.. I have did that. but I am asking about cell parameter optimization. Is it necessary for .cif file getting form COD??

Thanks

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:55 PM Stefaan Cottenier <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Yes, optimization of the atomic positions is absolutely necessary to
    have a meaningful value for Vzz and eta in a supercell.

    Stefaan

    *From:*Wien <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of
    *Ramsewak Kashyap
    *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2019 12:23 PM
    *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Subject:* [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

    Hi Wien2k users,

    I am doing EFG calculation for TiNi monoclinic phase, but I am
    getting large difference in Calculated and measured value, I have
    taken parameters from COD, then make 2x2x2 supercell and replace one
    Ti with Ta atom... is structural optimization is necessary??  and
    eta value was also quite large as compare to measured value.

--
    Ramsewak Kashyap
    Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics
    9473811023

    _______________________________________________
    Wien mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
    SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html


--

Ramsewak Kashyap
Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics
9473811023


_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
[email protected]
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html


--

                                      P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: [email protected]    WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/TC_Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
[email protected]
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html

Reply via email to