Dear Wien2K experts, I am calculating the hyperfine field of lithium in battery materials, which usually is transition metal oxide, HFF of Li comes from transition metal ions.
I clear that HFFXXX(in case.scf) corresponds to isotropic paramagnetic shift, while I also have to simulate NMR spectrum (the shape of spin sideband) with hyperfine field anisotropic. After careful check the mail list, I believe DIPAN is what I have to use. Am I right? If so, I have several questions: 1. DIPAN use a lattice summation over the magnetic moments of all sites, which attribute all spin density to certain nucleus as point magnetons. Other codes, such as CP2K, CRYSTAL and VASP integral the spin density directly. What is the pros and cons for this two schemes? 2. A example hyperfine field anisotropic output of CP2k is: -1.5614239048 5.8480253506 -4.2472955850 A_ani [Mhz] 5.8480253506 4.0184112292 0.8464507946 -4.2472955850 0.8464507946 -2.4569873244 Which is a symmetric 3x3 traceless matrix. While in DIPAN, I get : Matrix of dipolar fields 0.0000 -0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0448 0.0448 -0.0028 -0.0028 -0.0005 0.0041 -0.0005 0.0041 -0.0003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0244 0.0244 -0.0024 -0.0024 0.0041 -0.0013 0.0041 -0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.1359 0.0260 0.0030 -0.0017 -0.0024 0.0045 -0.0019 -0.0028 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0260 -0.1359 -0.0017 0.0030 -0.0019 -0.0028 -0.0024 0.0045 0.0001 0.0000 -0.0001 0.0000 0.0022 0.0413 -0.0015 0.0057 0.0045 -0.0020 -0.0039 -0.0027 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0001 0.0413 0.0022 0.0057 -0.0015 -0.0039 -0.0027 0.0045 -0.0020 -0.0004 -0.0001 0.0001 -0.0001 -0.0968 0.3749 0.0000 -0.0022 0.0009 0.0012 -0.0002 0.0015 -0.0004 -0.0001 -0.0001 0.0001 0.3749 -0.0968 -0.0022 0.0000 -0.0002 0.0015 0.0009 0.0012 -0.0001 0.0001 -0.0001 -0.0001 0.2796 -0.2378 0.0008 -0.0002 0.0000 -0.0022 0.0015 -0.0003 0.0005 -0.0000 0.0001 -0.0001 -0.1254 -0.1691 0.0011 0.0014 -0.0022 0.0000 -0.0003 -0.0010 -0.0001 0.0001 -0.0001 -0.0001 -0.2378 0.2796 -0.0002 0.0008 0.0015 -0.0003 0.0000 -0.0022 0.0005 -0.0000 -0.0001 0.0001 -0.1691 -0.1254 0.0014 0.0011 -0.0003 -0.0010 -0.0022 0.0000 Using the case.indipan: 56. 1 Rmax (a.u.); iprint 0.00539 magnetic moment of 1 atom (:MMI001) 0.00146 magnetic moment of 2 atom (:MMI002) 0.00143 magnetic moment of 3 atom (:MMI003) 2.73152 magnetic moment of 4 atom (:MMI004) 0.04182 magnetic moment of 5 atom (:MMI005) 0.04424 magnetic moment of 6 atom (:MMI006) 682.51653 Volume of unit cell (:VOL) 3 1. 1. 1. 1st direction of magnetic moment 1. 1. 1. 2nd direction of magnetic moment 1. 1. 1. 2nd direction of magnetic moment So, how to make those results in same convention and comparable? Thanks. ——————————————— Min Lin 2018 Ph. D student Physical Chemistry Chemistry Department Chemistry & College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Xiamen University China e-mail: lin...@stu.xmu.edu.cn
_______________________________________________ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html