Yes Sir,
I have just finished the calculation with mBJ and the band gap is in
agreement with HSE (< 0.2eV difference).

Thank you very much.

Fatima


On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:27 PM Tran, Fabien <fabien.t...@tuwien.ac.at>
wrote:

> So, finally you could do the calculation on the monolayer with grr fixed
> to the one from the bulk?
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Wien <wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> on behalf of
> fatima DFT <fatimad...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2020 8:50 AM
> *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
> *Subject:* Re: [Wien] TETRA for 2D system
>
> I am sorry sir, if I could not make it clear to you.
> Yes, on MP it is in bulk form.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:13 PM Tran, Fabien <fabien.t...@tuwien.ac.at>
> wrote:
>
>> Your explanations are still confusing. What is available on the MP
>> website? The structure of the bulk or monolayer?
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Wien <wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> on behalf of
>> fatima DFT <fatimad...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2020 2:10 AM
>> *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
>> *Subject:* Re: [Wien] TETRA for 2D system
>>
>> Thank you Sir,
>> Yes, I found the bulk structure on the MP website. The author
>> manipulated the atomic positions and then created a monolayer. So the
>> information about exact bulk structure  is missing.
>> I am using case.grr from the structure taken from MP website.
>>
>> Thank you very much
>>
>> Fatima
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:48 AM Tran, Fabien <fabien.t...@tuwien.ac.at>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From your email it is not clear if there is or not a corresponding bulk
>>> solid. But it seems that you found one from the MP website? If yes, then do
>>> the mBJ calculation on this structure (maybe it does not really matter to
>>> optimize the structure or not) and use the file case.grr for the monolayer
>>> calculation (and, as explained in Sec. 4.5.10 of the user's guide, don't
>>> forget to delete the file case.in0_grr).
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Wien <wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> on behalf of
>>> fatima DFT <fatimad...@gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 14, 2020 6:28 PM
>>> *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Wien] TETRA for 2D system
>>>
>>> Thank you Sir.
>>> I see in the case of mBJ the value in the case.grr file is updating in
>>> each cycle.
>>> So what I understand now is:
>>> Perform mBJ on a well relaxed bulk structure  and then use the case.grr
>>> file for surface calculation.
>>>
>>> But for me, it is difficult to get the exact struct file for its bulk
>>> form. The monolayer is reported for the very first time in recent.
>>> I took the cif file from a literature paper and no information about its
>>> exact bulk form (c parameter and how monolayer was created). No response
>>> from the authors.
>>>
>>> I took a rough estimate of c parameter from its original Bulk
>>> material from MP and doing a test calculation (without relaxing the
>>> structure)  for mBJ to get the grr file.
>>> Is it okay to do this?
>>> Please guide me.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much
>>> Fatima
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 5:52 PM Peter Blaha <
>>> pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > If I understand correctly, I need to initialize the bulk case and use
>>>> > its case.grr file for the surface calculation and remove case.in0_grr
>>>> > file from the surface calculation.
>>>> Yes. But not only "initialize, but also run it to scf with mBJ.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > With TEMP(S), I can not get the band gap value with the grep command
>>>> on
>>>> > the terminal. Is there any workaround for this?
>>>>
>>>> Calculate it yourself. You have the "band-ranges" and occupations in
>>>> the
>>>> scf file. It should be easy to form the difference. (Anyway, the
>>>> printed
>>>> gap is only ok if the k-point (eg. Gamma) where the gap is minimal is
>>>> also in your klist.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > Is there any tentative date for the new release of the Wien2k version?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you
>>>> > Fatima
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 7:03 PM Peter Blaha
>>>> > <pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at <mailto:pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     Actually, for a 2D system one should NEVER use TETRA, but always
>>>> >     TEMP/TEMPS. (For systems with a band gap it does not really
>>>> matter)
>>>> >
>>>> >     mBJ: You should NOT use normal mBJ for surfaces. mBJ uses an
>>>> average
>>>> >     over the unit cell and this is meaningless for a system with
>>>> vacuum.
>>>> >
>>>> >     Instead you should use the case.grr file for a corresponding bulk
>>>> >     calculation and remove case.in0_grr from the surface calculation.
>>>> >
>>>> >     PS: In the next release a "local-mBJ" will be available, which
>>>> can be
>>>> >     applied also to surfaces.
>>>> >
>>>> >     On 10/14/20 9:38 AM, fatima DFT wrote:
>>>> >      > Dear Wien2k Users,
>>>> >      > I am running a 2D case (vacuum in c -direction) with Wien2k
>>>> 19.1
>>>> >     version.
>>>> >      > The case is relaxed with optB-88-vdw. PBE case was okay but for
>>>> >     mBJ the
>>>> >      > ground state energy is oscillating and the band gap is also
>>>> >      > overestimating by twice.
>>>> >      > After going through, I found that I should use "TEMPS 0.018"
>>>> [1].
>>>> >      >
>>>> >      > I have two  questions now:
>>>> >      > Can I use the scf case of PBE (finished with TETRA) and update
>>>> TEMPS
>>>> >      > 0.018 in case.in2c for mBJ or I need to do a fresh calculation
>>>> >     starting
>>>> >      > from PBE?
>>>> >      >
>>>> >      > Or should I use PRATT for the first few cycles and then update
>>>> >     TETRA/TEMPS?
>>>> >      >
>>>> >      >
>>>> >      > [1]
>>>> >      >
>>>> >
>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg09993.html
>>>> >      >
>>>> >      > Thank you
>>>> >      > Fatima
>>>> >      >
>>>> >      > _______________________________________________
>>>> >      > Wien mailing list
>>>> >      > Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>>> >     <mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>>>> >      > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>>> >      > SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
>>>> >
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>>>> >      >
>>>> >
>>>> >     --
>>>> >
>>>> >                                             P.Blaha
>>>> >
>>>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >     Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
>>>> >     Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
>>>> >     Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>>> >     <mailto:bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at>    WIEN2k:
>>>> http://www.wien2k.at
>>>> >     WWW: http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/TC_Blaha
>>>> >
>>>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>>> >     Wien mailing list
>>>> >     Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at <mailto:
>>>> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>>>> >     http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>>> >     SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
>>>> >
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Wien mailing list
>>>> > Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>>> > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>>> > SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>                                        P.Blaha
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
>>>> Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
>>>> Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
>>>> WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/TC_Blaha
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wien mailing list
>>>> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>>> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wien mailing list
>>> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wien mailing list
>> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to