At the end, only a benchmark can tell.
These are a bit older processors, but they have the advantage of 4
memory channels (instead of 2). Since we know that when all cores are
used, the speed is limited by the memory, it could well be that they are
faster in these cases (and usually, due to parallelization, this is the
usual usage of a cpu).
For some reasons, Intel did not come up with newer "X" processors so far
(maybe they want to sell their more expensive Xeons).
It could be a good choice, however, I'd expect the cpu and the
motherboard will be a bit more expensive ?
Am 26.09.2021 um 18:20 schrieb SANDEEP ARORA:
Can an X-series processor like i9-10900x or i9-9900x with larger memory
bandwidth (94 GB/s and 85GB/s
vs 50GB/s for i9-11700k and i7-10700k) but slower RAM DDR42933 make
faster calculations.
Sandeep Arora
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
