Yes, R cells are first converted into H (making it already 3 times larger than the primitive R cell).

The "accepting repeat atoms at z=0" makes the non-stoichiometry. It leads to 2 identical surfaces and inversion symmetry (cheaper calc), but non-stoiciometry. It is not always clear what the best model for a surface is. Yours is Te terminated, but maybe another termination is more favorable (Bi, or maybe another Te-layer ?)

Am 24.07.2023 um 10:51 schrieb Burhan Ahmed:
The 6ql slab is created with 1x1x2 supercell with vacuum in Z direction and accepting repeat atoms at z=0 (using x supercell program). At first the x supercell convert rhombohedral cell into hexagonal and then from hexagonal cell I have created the 1x1x2 supercell and then I took the structure suggested by sgroup.

Yes sorry for that I have used MSR1a method for the relaxation.

The force convergence is set to 1 Ry.

On Mon, 24 Jul, 2023, 2:06 pm Peter Blaha, <peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.at <mailto:peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.at>> wrote:

    I'm not sure how you get a non-stoichimetric cell with a multiplicative
    number of unit cells, unless you said you want to repeat the atom at
    z=0.
    Of course, without this extra layer, you may not have inversion and get
    2 different surface terminations in one calculation. This is the usual
    problem of slabs.
    Also symmetry will be reduced and "multiplicity" errors occur. But
    both,
    nn and sgroup create new struct files where this has been corrected.

    If possible, I would also go to a smaller number of layers.


    Am 24.07.2023 um 10:13 schrieb Burhan Ahmed:
     > That is very true. I made the slab using the tutorial available
    in the
     > wien2k user manual by executing x-supercell program. What I found is
     > that the 6ql supercell consist of an extra Te atom. But whenever
    I try
     > to remove this atom I got multiplicity error. Sir, what is best
    possible
     > way of making slab with vacuum or surfaces??
     >
     > Thanks
     >
     > Regards
     >
     > Burhan Ahmed
     >
     > *Research Scholar, AUS *
     >
     > *From: *Laurence Marks <mailto:laurence.ma...@gmail.com
    <mailto:laurence.ma...@gmail.com>>
     > *Sent: *Saturday, July 22, 2023 6:30 PM
     > *To: *A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
     > <mailto:wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
    <mailto:wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>>
     > *Subject: *Re: [Wien] calculation with lmbj potential
     >
     > Others will probably give you suggestions about converging mBJ. Some
     > deeper comments.
     >
     > The most common reason that calculations behave badly is user error.
     > Sometimes this is doing the initialization wrong, often it is
    creating
     > an inappropriate model. Just because one can use x supercell or
    related
     > codes to create atomic positions does /not/ make them sensible.
     >
     > Your slab has a composition Bi12 Te19, i.e. it is Te rich. You
    therefore
     > have a reduced, n-type semiconductor with a small gap (about 0.1eV)
     > which will behave badly. If you look at your BVS you will see
    that atom
     > Te7 is severely underco-ordinated (unstable).
     >
     > I doubt that your slab will ever converge to anything which
    should be
     > published. Surfaces are not simple, it is unfortunately too easy
    to set
     > something up and get it wrong. (There are many papers in the
    literature
     > of dubious merit.)
     >
     > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:47 PM Burhan Ahmed
    <burhan.ah...@aus.ac.in <mailto:burhan.ah...@aus.ac.in>
     > <mailto:burhan.ah...@aus.ac.in <mailto:burhan.ah...@aus.ac.in>>>
    wrote:
     >
     >     Dear experts, I am doing an scf calculation taking lmbj
    potential.
     >     My system is a slab of 6ql with a vacuum of 40 ang along c-axix.
     >     Whenever I try to run the scf calculation including SOC,
    after 999
     >     iteration the scf is still not converged. I have analyzed the scf
     >     file, it shows the fluctuating nature. At first the selected
    Rmt was
     >     2.5 then I reduces it to 2.34 and again convergence failed
    after 999
     >     cycle. I have included -hdlo and -lvns 8 switch in init_lapw
    as it
     >     shows heavy atom. I am attaching the case.struct file. Hoping for
     >     any suggestion/solution.
     >
     >     Regards
     >
     >     Burhan Ahmed
     >
     >     *Research Scholar, AUS *
     >
     >     _______________________________________________
     >     Wien mailing list
     > Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
    <mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
    <mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
    <mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>>
     > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
    <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien>
     >     <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
    <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien>>
     >     SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
     >
    http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html> 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html>>
     >
     >
     > --
     >
     > Professor Laurence Marks (Laurie)
     > Department of Materials Science and Engineering
     > Northwestern University
     > www.numis.northwestern.edu <http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>
    <http://www.numis.northwestern.edu <http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>>
     > "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
     > nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Györgyi
     >
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > Wien mailing list
     > Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
    <mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
     > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
    <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien>
     > SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html>

-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
    Phone: +43-1-58801-165300
Email: peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.at <mailto:peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.at> WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at <http://www.wien2k.at>
    WWW: http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at <http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at>
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    Wien mailing list
    Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at <mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
    http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
    <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien>
    SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html>


_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300
Email: peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.at    WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to