Also, you can ask in the village pumps in PL and RU. You will get replies from the recent changes patrollers.
2010/8/20 Felipe Ortega <glimmer_phoe...@yahoo.es> > --- El *vie, 20/8/10, emijrp <emi...@gmail.com>* escribió: > > > De: emijrp <emi...@gmail.com> > Asunto: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Polish and Russian vandalism revert tags > Para: "Research into Wikimedia content and communities" < > wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Fecha: viernes, 20 de agosto, 2010 18:22 > > Hi; > > 2010/8/20 Felipe Ortega > <glimmer_phoe...@yahoo.es<http://mc/compose?to=glimmer_phoe...@yahoo.es> > > > > > That's also why we are not currently using the MD5 hash approach (we do > need to differentiate among different types of reverts, not only detect > them). > > > But you can use MD5 to identify *all* the reverts, and then classify them > with their comments. > > Sure, and I think MD5 is a pretty efficient way of identify reverts. The > point is that, once we start looking at comments, it's better to go ahead > with them, since in theory we don't need to check against MD5 if we missed > some revert. > > However, we will have to compare MD5 and comments procedures. Comments are > considered a fairly conservative approach, though a good proxy, and that's > why we selected them. > > F. > > Regards, > emijrp > > -----Adjunto en línea a continuación----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org<http://mc/compose?to=wiki-researc...@lists.wikimedia.org> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
