Peter M-R's , along with I think essentially everybody, agrees that the abstracts prepared by the *publishers* are unquestionably copyright. What he is proposing the use of is abstracts we prepare ourselves and publish under a free license. Publishers have never denied the right to do this manually; they claim to deny the right to do so using computer technology, and Peter is contesting this--I hope successfully
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Dario Taraborelli <dtarabore...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-access/2012-February/000106.html -- David Goodman DGG at the enWP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
