Ward Cunningham writes: If we combine his list with your experience then we have a clear view of the collision that would motivate a new kind of journal, not just a new journal.
Yes, but if there is a serious desire to get a new journal off the ground, I would suggest starting with a set of business practices around reviewing that will give the "academic respectability" required by many universities. Then expand (rather than change) the modes of publication offered by the journal to incorporate/experiment with new approaches. I think being too radical in every spect initially is likely to make the project too high risk to gain support. Kerry _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
