Anyway, if we finally create a new Open-Access journal or whatever, that
may be a good place to test all the innovative and cutting-edge ideas about
research publishing.

I think we may start with a model that is new and works fine (e.g. OA
journals) and at the same time, keep the door open to innovation.

This scenario is very exciting.

2012/9/22 Joe Corneli <holtzerman...@gmail.com>

> Thanks, added that to http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



-- 
Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada. E-mail: emijrp AT gmail DOT com
Pre-doctoral student at the University of Cádiz (Spain)
Projects: AVBOT <http://code.google.com/p/avbot/> |
StatMediaWiki<http://statmediawiki.forja.rediris.es>
| WikiEvidens <http://code.google.com/p/wikievidens/> |
WikiPapers<http://wikipapers.referata.com>
| WikiTeam <http://code.google.com/p/wikiteam/>
Personal website: https://sites.google.com/site/emijrp/
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to