On Reasonator, the list of matching items has a link in "You can also browse the list here." That link will take you to AutoList. I have added a new download function (next to "Permalink" and "Embed") that lets you download all the AutoList results with labels, descriptions, and site links in the current language as a tabbed file.
Does that help? Cheers, Magnus On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gerard, > That link you just sent shows the names in the category (I see there > are already a few more than 264 - cool). Could it be possible to have > the Q numbers shown as well? Now I see the Q number with mouse-over, > but if Magnus (cc'ing him now) could let me screen-scrape those then I > can first update my data and then send you my m-f data with Q numbers. > Jane > > 2014-04-21 9:03 GMT+02:00, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: > > Hoi, > > There are only 264 people identified as Radcliffe alumni. Someone did a > job > > on adding this fact to Wikidata so I started off with some 250 already. I > > completed the list. The category information on Wikidata includes a query > > that shows you the current number.. There is a similar query on the > Harvars > > alumni category by the way. > > > > http://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?&q=8618565 > > > > As to your proposal to have a list and idenfity the Wikidata items from > > them.. Given that ToolScript does JavaScript, it should be doable. I > would > > ask Magnus to write an example that I could copy and change.. > > Thanks, > > GerardM > > > > > > On 21 April 2014 08:28, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Gerard, > >> Actually historically speaking, there will be fewer Harvard alumni as > >> women because they graduated from Radcliffe, not Harvard, no? > >> > >> Anyway, how about a trade - I will send you all of my male-female data > >> with Wikipedia entity names, and you send me back the Q numbers? Or > >> can you only accept data with Q numbers as a field? > >> > >> Jane > >> > >> 2014-04-21 7:58 GMT+02:00, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: > >> > Hoi, > >> > I blogged about the issue of sex ratios on Wikidata [1]. The > experiment > >> > I > >> > did with Harvard alumni was to get some idea about the number of > humans > >> who > >> > were not yet known as human. I added a substantial number of them to > >> > have > >> > an item for each entry in the category on the English Wikipedia. I > >> > assume > >> > that as a group they are relatively well covered; they are ivy league > >> > and > >> > some of the best and brightest studied there. When you look at the sex > >> > ratio for the Harvard educated, you will find that it is worse than > for > >> the > >> > general population. I suppose it is an indication of the amount of > >> > items > >> > that still need to be identified as human. > >> > Thanks, > >> > Gerard > >> > > >> > > >> > [1] > >> http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2014/04/wikidata-its-sex-ratio.html > >> > > >> > > >> > On 21 April 2014 00:53, Stuart A. Yeates <syea...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Gerard Meijssen > >> >> <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > To be blunt, Wikidata gains the quantitative quality I am looking > >> >> > for > >> >> when only male and female > >> >> > is added where applicable. Transgender issues with respect are edge > >> >> cases. > >> >> > >> >> Transgender issues are primarily raised because they're vitally > >> >> important for people today, but they're not the only issues. > >> >> > >> >> Far more numerically superior are the issues of people writing under > >> >> other-gendered pseudonyms; that's a systemic problem, in the GND data > >> >> for example. "Lord Charles Albert" "Florian Wellesley" and "Currer > >> >> Bell" were only outed as pseudonyms of Charlotte Brontë once she > >> >> achieved a certain level of fame. Modern analysis suggests that there > >> >> are probably thousands if not tens of thousands of other writers who > >> >> never achieved that level of fame and never had their pseudonyms > >> >> revealed. GND and similar library data commonly base their gender > data > >> >> on nothing more than the apparent gender of the name on the cover > page > >> >> (librarianship practice, unlike archival practise, takes such things > >> >> at face value). To take that librarianship practise out of context > and > >> >> assert that that those thousands or tens of thousands of authors were > >> >> men (rather than just publishing under male or ambiguous names) isn't > >> >> going to get you sued, but that doesn't mean it's not the > >> >> white-washing of generations of women writers. > >> >> > >> >> cheers > >> >> stuart > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Wiki-research-l mailing list > >> >> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wiki-research-l mailing list > >> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > >> > > > -- undefined
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
