I haven’t yet had the opportunity to watch the YouTube version of the talk, but 
just taking the question at face value.

 

I don’t think the data is likely to be able to distinguish people doing their 
first edits at a training class or edit-a-thon because in general there is 
nothing to distinguish these folk from any other new contributors. It might be 
that some events use some system of categories for either the users or the 
articles (editathons often tag the articles with the event name) so you might 
be able to spot edits arising from a specific event but in general I don’t 
think you can tell them apart.

 

I teach a lot of edit training and, although I have yet to switch to the VE, I 
am looking forward to being able to do so as soon as possible. Markup is 
definitely a barrier to some people and I think the VE will be preferred by 
most users. However, while VE may make editing easier, it does not solve the 
problem of having newcomers’ good faith contributions being reverted by others. 
WP:NOBITE is the most ignored policy of Wikipedia. 

 

Kerry

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pine W
Sent: Sunday, 2 August 2015 3:58 PM
To: Wiki Research-l <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] July 2015 Research showcase

 

I read the summary of the VE study, and I have a question. Anecdotally, I am 
hearing from multiple sources that new editors *who attend workshops or 
editathons in person* prefer VE over wikitext for ease of use. Do we have any 
data specifically about the productivity and longevity of this population of 
users when they are introduced to to Wikipedia editing on VE instead of 
wikitext?

Thanks!
Pine

On Jul 29, 2015 11:09 AM, "Leila Zia" <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

A friendly reminder that this is happening in 23 min. :-)

YouTube stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGyrVg_qKSM
IRC: #wikimedia-research

Best,

Leila

 

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Leila Zia <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi everyone,

The next Research showcase will be live-streamed this Wednesday, July 29 at 
11.30 PT. The streaming link will be posted on the lists a few minutes before 
the showcase starts (sorry, we haven't been able to solve this, yet. :-() and 
as usual, you can join the conversation on IRC at #wikimedia-research.

We look forward to seeing you!

Leila


This month:

VisualEditor's effect on newly registered users

By  <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Halfak_%28WMF%29> Aaron Halfaker
 
It's been nearly two years since we ran an initial study 
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:VisualEditor%27s_effect_on_newly_registered_editors/June_2013_study>
  of VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors. While most of the 
results of this study were positive (e.g. workload on Wikipedians did not 
increase), we still saw a significant decrease in the newcomer productivity. In 
the meantime, the Editing <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Editing>  team has 
made substantial improvements to performance and functionality. In this 
presentation, I'll report on the results of a new experiment designed to test 
the effects of enabling this improved VisualEditor software for newly 
registered users by default. I'll show what we learned from the experiment and 
discuss some results have opened larger questions about what, exactly, is 
difficult about being a newcomer to English Wikipedia.

 

Wikipedia knowledge graph with DeepDive

By Juhana Kangaspunta and Thomas Palomares (10-week student project)
 
Despite the tremendous amount of information present on Wikipedia, only a very 
little amount is structured. Most of the information is embedded in text and 
extracting it is a non-trivial challenge. In this project, we try to populate 
Wikidata, a structured component of Wikipedia, using DeepDive tool to extract 
relations embedded in the text. We finally extracted more than 140,000 
relations with more than 90% average precision. We will present DeepDive and 
the data that we use for this project, we explain the relations we focused on 
so far and explain the implementation and pipeline, including our model, 
features and extractors. Finally, we detail our results with a thorough 
precision and recall analysis.

 


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to