good point, Sam, imo actually the best so far :-)

---------- Original Message -----------
From:Sam Katz <smk...@gmail.com>
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities <wiki-research-
l...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent:Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:41:12 -0600
Subject:Re: [Wiki-research-l] citing female academics

> Let me comment on the original question. The 
> correct citation is typically the oldest one known 
> to the researcher, not the most popular.
> 
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Gerard Meijssen 
<gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hoi,
> > I am truly happy that Wikidata is its own master. When a Wikipedia has
> > certain policies it is welcome to it. As long as they do not use Wikidata
> > to improve the quality of its content [1] and by the same token improve 
the
> > data at Wikidata, I am not interested what a Wikipedia does.
> > Thanks,
> >       GerardM
> >
> > [1]
> > http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2016/01/wikipedia-lowest-
hanging-fruit-from.html
> >
> > On 28 February 2016 at 20:31, Stuart A. Yeates <syea...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> >
> >> Wikidata appears to allow original research and the inference of gender
> >> from the name or photo of the subject. It will be a cold day in hell 
before
> >> en.wiki allows this, see [[WP:RS]] and .[[WP:OR]].
> >>
> >> cheers
> >> stuart
> >> --
> >> ...let us be heard from red core to black sky
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> >>
> >>> But there have also been lots of corrections. As far as painters go, the
> >>> data is really pretty decent now. It helps that it's really easy to check
> >>> the state of Wikidata against the contents of Wikipedia categories. As 
more
> >>> people become aware of how to make such checks, I think we start to 
see a
> >>> cleanup of categories and (I hope) a better categorization system 
starting
> >>> to form that is more  in line with Wikidata property class trees.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Stuart A. Yeates 
<syea...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Data has been sucked from GND to wikidata via a number of routes,
> >>>> principally VIAF.
> >>>> See 
Wikidata:Bot_requests#Import_GND_identifiers_from_VIAF_dump for 
example
> >>>> for a discussion of an instance of this.
> >>>>
> >>>> cheers
> >>>> stuart
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ...let us be heard from red core to black sky
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Gerard Meijssen <
> >>>> gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hoi,
> >>>>> The blog states that a lot of data was sucked into Wikidata from 
GND.
> >>>>> As far as I am aware that never happened. So its assertion is wrong.
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>       GerardM
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 28 February 2016 at 19:43, Stuart A. Yeates 
<syea...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> ...let us be heard from red core to black sky
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Gerard Meijssen <
> >>>>>> gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hoi,
> >>>>>>> It is trivial when you only consider Wikidata.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've previous blogged about the issues with sex / gender in 
wikidata
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>> http://opensourceexile.blogspot.co.nz/2014/07/adrian-pohl-
wrote-some-excellent.html
> >>>>>> has the sitaution moved on?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> cheers
> >>>>>> stuart
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> >>>>>> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> >>>>> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> >>>> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> >>> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> >> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >
> >
------- End of Original Message -------


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to