Hi Jonathan,

Can you please give a concrete example of what, for example, the
http://ide.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/SSRN-id3039505.pdf
researchers would have had to do differently under this new policy?

Best regards,
Jim

> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:29:03 -0800
> From: Jonathan Morgan <jmor...@wikimedia.org>
> To: Wiki Research-l <Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: [Wiki-research-l] New policy about performing research on English 
> Wikipedia
>
> Hi there wiki-research folks,
>
> This is just a heads-up that English Wikipedia has adopted a new policy[1]
> about research on that project. The policy codifies some new requirements
> for community notification and disclosure that potentially apply to all
> research projects (regardless of the affiliation of the researcher).
>
> You can read more about the policy on WP:NOT[1], but I've included the
> major points below for your convenience:
>
>    - any research project that involves directly changing article content,
>    surveying a large number of editors, or asking editors sensitive questions
>    about their real-life identities needs to be discussed on Wikipedia's
>    Village Pump[2] before it is begun[3]
>    - researchers should disclose who they are on their user pages,
>    including their institutional affiliation, sources of research funding (if
>    applicable), and the intentions behind their research[4]
>
> Many aspects of this policy boil down to either common sense, existing
> ethical standards for human subjects research, or both. However, this
> policy also leaves certain definitions and thresholds undefined. What is a
> "large number" of surveyed users? What is a "sensitive question"?
> There are no concrete answer to these questions yet, and that's probably a
> good thing. The best way to keep this policy from becoming overly
> restrictive[5] is for researchers to follow its guidance in good faith, and
> ask questions when they're uncertain.
>
> Projects that are deemed to be in violation of these guidelines may lose
> editing privileges. If the violations are deemed particularly frequent or
> severe, the EnWiki community may decide to make even more rules, which
> could have a chilling effect on wikiresearch in general. Nobody wants
> that.
>
> If you have general questions about this policy or its application, the
> best place to ask is the WP:NOT talkpage.[6]
>
> If you have questions related to a specific planned research project, the
> best thing to do is to err on the side of caution and open up a discussion
> on the Village Pump before you begin.
>
> You are also welcome to post your project plan to this list, where we, your
> friendly peers, will hopefully offer constructive feedback and links to
> relevant resources.
>
> Wikimedia Foundation research staff are not in charge of these guidelines,
> but are happy to offer advice "from the trenches" so to speak if asked. We
> are on this list too.
>
> As always, if you are currently researching Wikipedia, or plan to do so,
> please create a Research Project page on MetaWiki[7] (example[8], tips[9]),
> keep it up to date, and link to it from your userpage[10]. That way
> interested parties can follow your research and ask questions, and you
> won't need to constantly re-explain what you're doing every time someone
> asks.
>
> Happy researching,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>    1.
>    
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_laboratory
>    2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)
>    3.
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#cite_note-7
>    4.
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#cite_note-8
>    5. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Instruction_creep
>    6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not
>    7. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Projects
>    8.
>    
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Supporting_Commons_contribution_by_GLAM_institutions
>    9.
>    
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Project_documentation_best_practices
>    10. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:LZia_(WMF)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan T. Morgan
> Senior Design Researcher
> Wikimedia Foundation
> User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)>

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to