Done: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_on_ENWP_Discretionary_Sanctions
Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:25 PM Sydney Poore <sydney.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Sydney Poore <spo...@wikimedia.org> > To: Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> > Cc: wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:20:40 -0400 > Subject: Re: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP > Hello Pine, > You might want to record it in the IdeaLab to make sure that it considered > for future reference when people are discussing ideas for research. > Sydney > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello colleagues, >> >> There is currently a small amount of discussion happening on an ENWP >> arbitration page >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_Discretionary_sanctions> >> regarding what ENWP calls "discretionary sanctions >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions>" >> practices. Does anyone know of research regarding the effects, good and >> bad, of the Arbcom authorization of discretionary sanctions? If not, then I >> suggest that this be a topic of future research, particularly for >> researchers involved with WMF's work on community health. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Pine >> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) >> > > > -- > Sydney Poore > Trust and Safety Specialist > Wikimedia Foundation > Trust and Safety team; > Anti-harassment tools team > > > -- > Sydney Poore > Trust and Safety Specialist > Wikimedia Foundation > Trust and Safety team; > Anti-harassment tools team > _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
