This doesn't answer your question directly, but it provides a temporal view into quality control tools: https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~halfaker/publications/When_the_Levee_Breaks/geiger13levee-preprint.pdf
TL;DR: ClueBot NG reverts vandalism within 5 seconds, people using Huggle review within ~30s, and people reverting manually take minutes to days to remove damage. Also, we can see that when ClueBot NG is down, the median time to reversion goes up substantially. On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:19 AM Haifeng Zhang <haife...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > This might be a known fact already. > > Does it take less time (on average) for an editor to identify a > vandalistic edit when using counter-vandalism tools, e.g., Huggle or STiki? > If so, what features of these tools support such decision? > > > Thanks for your time, > > Haifeng Zhang > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
