I don’t think userboxes are the best thing to use as evidence for any claim
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Nick Wilson (Quiddity) <nwil...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > See also > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Health/Mental > and semi-related > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Personality > plus the essays > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Obsessive%E2%80%93compulsive_disorder_editors > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:High-functioning_autism_and_Asperger%27s_editors > (plus the French and Chinese Wikipedia's equivalent pages for that second > essay, which likely have different content) > > Sidenote: I worry about those userboxes, for the same reasons mentioned in > this thread. I wonder if there ought to be a warning at the top of that > listing-page, reminding editors to be careful... [but userboxes are a > complicated can of worms, and it's probably been discussed before, so I > won't wade into it.] > > --Quiddity > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > -- Thanks, Samuel _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
