https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16561
--- Comment #5 from ^demon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-04 13:27:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > @ ^demon : On the other hand when you change template there is process which > refreshes its "what links here" and all you need is to do exactly the same. So > once somebody edits a page then software has to refresh "what links here" and > invalidate cache. Just like for templates. > The only difference being: 1) If it's a template, we can quickly check if it's being transcluded, so we know if we need to update the cache. 2) If it's being created/deleted/restored, we know where to check to turn links blue/red appropriately. In either scenario, we are only invalidating caches in a subset of editing scenarios. Adding this would require either A) A sectionlinks table storing this metadata so we know what to fix, or B) Reparse all links to the page, they *might* have a section needing updating Both of which apply to all situations in which headers (or potentially, only 2nd level headers) are updated, which is a much larger subset of editing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
