https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14286
Anon Sricharoenchai <anon....@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|LATER |
--- Comment #8 from Anon Sricharoenchai <anon....@gmail.com> 2009-03-02
06:03:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> This would break caching, or be broken by caching. For example: a server-wide
> timestamp is static until the page is purged, but a username showing in a page
> would be cached and be wrong for the next viewer. However, there is the
> possiblity of allowing user-specific magic words that are subst'able only.
>
> Related:
> * https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4196
> * https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10336
>
The already implemented {{int:...}} also kill content caching?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
