https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32888
--- Comment #7 from athenurlau...@hotmail.com 2011-12-10 00:10:36 UTC --- 1. Yes - the embedded table isn't even defined as sortable, and unless it has more columns than its parent, the sortability also isn't inherited. Which is good. 2. Ok, I'll explain: within a sortable table, I have one column that contains tables organizing its contents in a visually clear and consistent structure (this column doesn't need to be sortable). This column's header contains a table too, which parallels the embedded tables' structure, and whose cells can thus refer to their counterparts within the tables listed below. A perfectly reasonable usage. 3. I assume this bug arouses from a logical flaw in programming. If instead of "sticking a band aid" on it you'll figure out the flaw and "cure the infection at the root", I'm sure it won't compromise performance, but will more likely enhance it. Or am I missing something and this isn't a bug at all, but rather a programmer's intentional "compromise", designed to enhance performance but assuming nobody will ever need to embedd a table in a header? 4. As I mentioned (maybe I wasn't clear enough), the bug didn't exist before the sorting button's appearance was changed. A clue to figure out who messed what up back then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
