https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17543


MZMcBride <pub...@mzmcbride.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pub...@mzmcbride.com
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|LATER                       |




--- Comment #5 from MZMcBride <pub...@mzmcbride.com>  2009-04-02 09:28:01 UTC 
---
Re-opening for the moment for further consideration.

While it's annoying to query (for example) for the latest editor and have it be
null, requiring oversighters to make a trivial edit in order to be able to hide
Bad information seems rather silly and counter-intuitive. Obviously it
shouldn't be possible to hide page text for the top revision, but hiding user
names and summaries seems reasonable.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to