https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17543
MZMcBride <pub...@mzmcbride.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pub...@mzmcbride.com Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|LATER | --- Comment #5 from MZMcBride <pub...@mzmcbride.com> 2009-04-02 09:28:01 UTC --- Re-opening for the moment for further consideration. While it's annoying to query (for example) for the latest editor and have it be null, requiring oversighters to make a trivial edit in order to be able to hide Bad information seems rather silly and counter-intuitive. Obviously it shouldn't be possible to hide page text for the top revision, but hiding user names and summaries seems reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l