https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10788
MZMcBride <b...@mzmcbride.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |schema-change, shell
Priority|Low |Normal
Version|unspecified |1.20-svn
--- Comment #8 from MZMcBride <b...@mzmcbride.com> 2012-03-03 23:44:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
>> I'm committing a schema change for this now. It will require a new index on
>> the revision table, so it probably won't be live for quite some time even
>> once
>> the code to do it is written.
>>
>
> Removing schema-change keyword on the assumption that it's already happened:
> the comment is from 2007 and the API manages to do this just fine
> (prop=revisions&rvuser=Catrope&titles=Main_Page).
Re-adding "schema-change" keyword and adding "shell" keyword (someone has to
apply the change, after all). Also targeting this for 1.20 and bumping
importance a bit, per my reasoning at bug 2667 comment 4.
The assumption here is faulty, I think. Or at least this is easily answerable.
I asked in #wikimedia-tech if the index "INDEX page_user_timestamp
(rev_page,rev_user,rev_timestamp)" was on the revision table. DaB. said that
the Toolserver didn't have this index, so it was likely that the masters don't
either. Based on this, I'd like hard evidence to be able to say that a schema
change isn't necessary here still.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
