https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25931
--- Comment #32 from Asher Feldman <afeld...@wikimedia.org> 2012-05-03 20:58:17 UTC --- There's no reason why the indexer couldn't pull in categorylinks instead of whatever its doing now (parsing wikitext?) but we are currently short on resources when it comes to developing around lucene. An upgraded search infrastructure with real-time indexing and greater accessibility around index definitions could open the door to all sorts of features that aren't currently practical in mediawiki at wikipedia scale. (In reply to comment #30) > >1) Send lucene an incategory query with a limit of 1 to cheaply get the total > >number of articles indexed in the given category. Stuff this in memcache > >with a > >reasonable ttl (couple hours?) and try to grab there next time so lucene is > >only called once. > > I was under the impression that lucence's incategory only worked for > categories > directly listed on a page (aka not inherited from a template). That would be a > major negative point for using a lucence based solution (unless that issue > could be fixed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
