https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9838
--- Comment #23 from Tyler Romeo <tylerro...@gmail.com> 2012-06-10 23:08:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > user_newtalk has existed since the first MediaWiki version, by Lee Daniel > Crocker, before there were caching layers for mediawiki. > It could probably appear on either of those places without much problem. I guess that's understandable, but I still don't believe using a memcached-only caching method is a reliable solution. It'd be like a CPU relying only on L1/2/3 cache and just not using regular memory whatsoever. Furthermore, I don't see any disadvantage in investing in a staged caching system, where the information is stored in memcached but also kept in the database in the case of a cache miss. Memcached is not meant for stuff like this. (I recommend reading this article for a better explanation: http://joped.com/2009/03/a-rant-about-proper-memcache-usage/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
