https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37291
--- Comment #6 from Donald Lancon <dc...@obkb.com> 2012-06-11 22:22:28 UTC --- If you haven't already, please see the Meta page I pointed to in my initial post: <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Dcljr/Article_counts> That gives all the information I think someone would need to independently check my counts.... (In fact, it might be a good idea for someone to try to count the articles themselves without seeing my code first. My script is currently not available anywhere, but I can put it up at Meta if it's really necessary.) I've posted stats for 12 Wiktionaries and 15 Wikisources so far (each for a date before and a date after the running of the maintenance script). Take your pick for which one(s) you want to check. The exact definition I'm using for a "good" article is: "non-redirect in a content namespace with any kind of internal-style [[wikilink]]: page, category, image/file, interlanguage, or interwiki". AFAIK, that's the definition currently in use. Which pages contain each of these types of links are gleaned from the respective database dumps. For details, see the Meta page. For the Wiktionaries, I also show counts using three other sets of criteria (also explained at the Meta page). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
