https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40915
--- Comment #9 from Krinkle <krinklem...@gmail.com> 2012-10-11 17:28:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > It was rebased in October, and merged with a forced Verified:+2. > > > > Indeed, patchset 5 (a rebase) is the broken change. Should have waited for > > tests to finish before merging in :-] > > What if a merge was done without a rebase? Yes, in that case if might have gone wrong regardless (assuming no merge conflict). Which is exactly why we intended from the beginning[1] to run tests on-mergesubmit as opposed to on-push. This is the next step in the continuous integration plan, Hashar is already doing the ground work to make this happen. [1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Continuous_integration/Workflow_specification -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
