https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38012
Krinkle <krinklem...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Krinkle <krinklem...@gmail.com> 2012-11-13 02:51:15 UTC ---
cf. bug 37946 comment 3, I'm not sure what discussion there is left.
I think it's pretty straight forward and obvious:
* We use branch names like REL1_19, REL1_20
* We don't import from SVN (if wanted, we can do that later, not relevant to
this bug now)
* Maintainers are responsible from their branching, no mass-branching after
each release. That way the extension distributor etc. can display the
supported versions. And people would naturally select the older version if no
newer version is available. This also avoids "fake" releases from showing up in
the history.
Various extensions already have a REL and/or wmf-branch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
