https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43287
Richard Guk <richardg...@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |richardg...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guk <richardg...@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Just exposing the oldest job_timestamp isn't much use. You could have the
> oldest jobs that haven't been run/picked for some reason, but then most of
> the queue is of much newer time...
I have assumed that jobs are run either FIFO or (in effect) randomly; so that,
either way, the timestamp of the oldest job would be a meaningful indicator of
the maximum expected delay before the link table is updated after a recent
edit.
Is there a non-pathological reason why some jobs would be left in the queue
unrun/unpicked for an exceptional length of time?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
