https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40143
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Flaschen <mflasc...@wikimedia.org> --- I agree we should definitely do this. We don't necessarily have to use Doxygen. There are tools specifically for JavaScript. JSDoc has been suggested before (http://www.mail-archive.com/wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org/msg09167.html). If that doesn't work well, I've used YUIDoc in the past. But the bottom line is we have to pick one, get it running, then go through and fix the comments (whatever we pick we'll at least have to make adjustments). See also https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Documentation_overhaul#Implementation_ideas (which is broader in scope). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
