https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41441
--- Comment #11 from MZMcBride <b...@mzmcbride.com> ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Just counting the number of <h2>'s seems wrong, as I'm almost certain there
> would be exceptions, and lots of them.
Is this provable across Wiktionaries? I think this is an important point. As I
understand at least the English Wiktionary, they've gone a little buck-wild and
they do enforce rules like this, usually with bots.
> However, that said (And if we're going on the ultra-wiktionary specific. This
> is in essence an extension request), could we tie into the language
> categories ("Norwegian nouns", "English nouns", etc) maybe. Given how template
> happy wiktionary is, maybe a custom parser func could be added to the relavent
> template {{#has_lang:en}}, which could be looked at.
Don't we already have a {{#language:}} parser function? I wonder how often
that's used already in Wiktionary entries. Hmm.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
