https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #9 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <bawolff...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #6) > Well the two features which I think counter your theory are: > . it happens in discernible 'batches' rather than a steady trickle That's actually consistent somewhat with job queue. Someone edits a big template and big batch of jobs happen all at once. > . it happens to pages that haven't been edited for weeks. But did they use a template that got edited recently, or did the langlinks at wikidata get edited recently? > Unfortunately I > can't tell you most of them, because making a null edit doesn't show up on my > contributions list. Maybe you have access to something else I don't have access to anything you don't have (im just a volunteer). And I should note my guess is just a guess so theres quite a possibility it is wrong. A list of example pages wouldn't be that useful (to me anyhow). The parseroutput of the pages after going through a refreshlinks job might be mikdly interesting, but there's not an easy way to get that. > Actually, whatever it was, seems to have stopped. I think I ran the api > purger > yesterday morning, and not since. Not only that, but I think even the > previously usual content of perhaps 50% duds seems to have dried up too. > Something has changed somewhere. > > ~~~~ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
