https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36923
--- Comment #6 from MZMcBride <b...@mzmcbride.com> --- (In reply to comment #5) > I agree in opposing the change in general. I think from a usability point of > view it is justified to have the pagination only on one side of the page. The > bottom in our case. I don't see why they should be on top as well. I just hit this issue again recently. The issue that in addition to pagination controls being hidden (next 50, etc.), the limit controls (50 | 100 | 500) are also hidden. So I was searching for a particular string and wanted 500 results (instead of 50, which my default). Each time I did new search, I had to scroll all the way down to get a larger data set. This is silly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
