https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
--- Comment #9 from ssas...@wikimedia.org --- This should be possible to fix -- but requires additional tweaking of the p-wrapper. Tweaking the 'isBlockToken' by itself is insufficient since the output is wrapping everything in a single para whereas we effectively need p-breaks before and after the figure. We will probably need a special case in the p-wrapper for <figure>. But, the question is if we need <p>Lorem</p> <figure> .. </figure> <p>Ipsum</p> really if browsers treat the <figure> tag as a block element. Doesn't "Lorem <figure> .. </figure> Ipsum"? give you the same thing since the browser should break the flow before/after figure? Or is figure a flow element? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l