https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25931
Nemo <federicol...@tiscali.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |federicol...@tiscali.it
--- Comment #40 from Nemo <federicol...@tiscali.it> ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> Algorithm is:
> *Get earliest and newest cl_timestamp in a category
> *Pick a date in between
> *Pick an offset between 0 and 30
> *Get the page that is offset number of pages after the date picked.
>
> Thoughts?
So, the downside for this is that bulk of pages added to the category in
similar times would be constantly underrepresented, if I understand correctly.
Those might be category renames, bot additions, new templates including the
category... it may make it very hard to clear such big backlogs, but give a
better representation of more "human" (slow) additions to the category.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
