https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49860
--- Comment #71 from jbribe...@itaubba.com.br --- (In reply to comment #70) > I hate to say this but I recommend that this be rejected and closed as > WONTFIX. I'm sad because we tried our best and so far, NOTHING happened. Most of our most active patrollers simply gave up (myself included) and not a *single alternative measure* has been implemented so far - or, should I note, perhaps we have now lots of inactive rollbackers recently promoted). But the damage is done and we *looove* this kind of thing since we're used to "luminars" using force (or avoiding to do so when asked) to keep a community in line: our beloved-coup d'etat-prone military! Technocracy, huh? And with WMF help! I'm shocked and I'm sure it'll help a lot with the credibility of the VERY FEW WMF members trying to implement "the official plan" in our community. It is very easy to preach the "'we need new editors' gospel" when, behind the scenes, this is the kind of s*** we get even with overwhelming community support (even if it is for a short time while, we hope(d), some of you guys would snap out of this DEVELOPER-PROTECTOR-OF-THE-WIKI-SPIRIT-ATTITUDE and actually DO SOMETHING to help us!). One year is to much, really? What about 3 months conditioned to something actually being done? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
