https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50402
John Broughton <johnbrough...@comcast.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |johnbrough...@comcast.net
--- Comment #4 from John Broughton <johnbrough...@comcast.net> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Reaper Eternal's proposal is an excellent solution to the issue of what the
"Edit source" tab should be named, and partly addresses whether "Edit" should
be "Edit source" even when VE is not available (and thus there is one edit tab,
not two). His proposal is a good solution because it then allows individual
editors to alter these labels (I would prefer "VE" rather than "Edit", and
"Wikitext" rather than "Edit source",for example) via their own CSS, while
leaving the defaults as is for newer editors.
> I'm think the following request by English Wikipedia user Reaper Eternal is
> relevant to this bug (sorry if it isn't).
>
> "Currently, on articles and userpages, editing using the VisualEditor uses
> the
> #ca-edit CSS id and editing the source uses the #ca-editsource CSS id.
> However,
> in all other namespaces, #ca-edit is the only edit link. For people like me
> who
> like to change the titling or styling of the tabs, this inconsistency is
> annoying. (For me, it makes the "edit" tab on this page display as "VE"
> rather
> than "Source".) Could the CSS id tags be made consistent (use #ca-editsource
> for all non-VE editing)? Thanks."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
