https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37939

--- Comment #10 from James Forrester <jforres...@wikimedia.org> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I fail to see the purpose of nowikiing the remainder of a partially linked
> word.  If I link "LC circuit" in the string "LC circuits" then I expect the
> UI
> to create "[[LC circuit]]s", not "[[LC circuit]]</nowiki>s".  That latter
> behaviour is entirely useless in any normal editing scenario I can think of.
> 
> The selection should not be expanded automatically.  The UI should assume the
> editor knows what they are doing unless there is evidence to the contrary. 
> When I make a partial selection like this it means I want the UI to offer "LC
> circuit" as the link target and display "LC circuits" as the link text.

That may be what you expect, with your deep understanding of wikitext, but it's
very far from how normal visual editors work and so would be very confusing to
users who are not immersed in the fine points of link trails.

More fundamentally, making a change in one place that magically affects another
is a bad user experience. Why would this magic happen with links but not, say,
adding bold? Why would this happen down-word but not up (except on wikis with
linkhead instead of/as well as linktrail)? Etc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to