https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
--- Comment #6 from Tim Landscheidt <t...@tim-landscheidt.de> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I don't understand the question - what is meant by "point"?
Christian said:
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > [ Adding link to gerrit and setting PATCH__TO_REVIEW are separate
> > actions ]
> This splitting is an inherent limitation of the original design of
> gerrit's hooks-its plugin. With some effort, we could work around that
> from within hooks-bugzilla, but hooks-its' approach also comes with a
> benefit: If one of the two actions fail, the other is still carried
> out.
> If they were tied to a single request, they'd either both fail or both
> work.
> [...]
Are there other scenarios that need to be addressed besides the allowed state
=> PATCH_TO_REVIEW issue, or does this mean that once the policy question is
settled ("these are the allowed state transitions and we guarantee them UFN")
this bug can be fixed? For example, do we need upstream (Gerrit) changes as a
prerequisite?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
