https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Graham87 <graha...@jazi.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |graha...@jazi.net
--- Comment #1 from Graham87 <graha...@jazi.net> 2009-10-28 05:45:22 UTC ---
This sounds like a good idea, as long as it's possible to display 50 or 100
edits at a time for enormous histories, and it's possible to select all edits
besides one or two (like the invert selection button). I assume that the edits
that are left behind would be placed in the archive table so they wouldn't
clutter the page history.
I always use selective undeletion for history merges, so this wouldn't
entireley supercede the selective undeletion feature. With my method, where A
is the current title of the page and b is the one with the edits that need to
be merged, I history merge like this: move page A to page B (Page B is deleted
to make way for the page move), undelete old content edits of B, move B back to
A, undelete remaining redirect edits of B. Maybe I'm over-fussy, but I don't
like adding irrelevant redirect edits to an article's page history.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
