https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53986
Andre Klapper <aklap...@wikimedia.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |br...@wikimedia.org,
| |hus...@gmail.com,
| |krinklem...@gmail.com,
| |m...@tgries.de
--- Comment #12 from Andre Klapper <aklap...@wikimedia.org> ---
Just to give quick feedback:
Yes, I want to start using classifications, and at least evaluate it still in
this calendar year. I'm reluctant to move all extensions one level up, not
because it wouldn't make sense, but because it would be an extreme amount of
work via the UI (if nobody pops up with awesome SQL skills).
So I won't work on the tickets mentioned in comment 11 right away, because
comment 6 (refering to
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Bugzilla_taxonomy ) / bug
38990 is simply true.
I need to spend a few evenings with some beers and a paper printout of
Bugzilla's product/component structure and pick up thoughts on potential
categorizations (e.g. "Editing helper applications" or something for Huggle and
pywikipedia?). I simply don't want to move stuff twice, but I am also aware
that in history, "trying to do it right" often ends up in doing nothing.
(In reply to comment #10)
> "Tool Labs" would not be a component, the individual tools
> (or groups of tools e.g. "magnustools") would. "Tool Labs" as a whole has its
> components under "Wikimedia Labs" product.
Hmm. So as per comment 3 and comment 10 you propose
Wikimedia Labs > $tool on Tool Labs
instead of current
Tool Labs tools > $tool on Tool Labs
? I'm undecided.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
