https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54647

--- Comment #16 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <bawolff...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > How is it possible that Firefox' hard reload has another effect on wiki
> > servers than the one of other browsers?
> > An empty cache (I mean really deleted, with an entirely new profile) loads a
> > page the same way like a hard reload, I assume.
> 
> A normal page load is likely to send headers that allow intermediate caches
> to
> return a cached version of the page, while a hard reload will probably
> include
> headers that instruct intermediate caches not to cache.
> 
> In both Firefox and Chromium here a normal page load doesn't send any
> "Cache-Control" or "Pragma" headers, a normal reload (F5) sends
> "Cache-Control:
> max-age=0" (but no "Pragma"), and a hard reload (Ctrl+F5) sends both
> "Cache-Control: no-cache" and "Pragma: no-cache". Opera 16 seems to do the
> same
> thing.
> 
> On the other hand, IE 9 and 10 and Opera 12 seem to send a "Cache-Control:
> no-cache" with no "Pragma" header on any reload (both F5 and Ctrl+F5). I
> don't
> know whether that's actually the reason, but it's certainly plausible that
> Wikimedia's caching layer was only revalidating in response to "Pragma:
> no-cache" and not "Cache-Control: no-cache".

Interesting. OTOH wget -S --header 'cache-control: no-cache' --header 'pragma:
no-cache' 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page' has headers that still
suggest a cache hit.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to