https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54739

--- Comment #10 from Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> ---
I guess "duplicate" would be a better description. So, we have two priorities
when it comes to surfacing software changes/issues/features/whatever:

*Transparency to the community working on it. BZ doesn't directly provide for
that - that's more a mw.org/enwiki kind of thing.
*Transparency to the developers working on it. BZ has traditionally provided
for this and served as a repository for not only "bugs" or individual
"enhancements" but complex behavioural and interaction changes, such as this'n.
The issue is we're switching to using Mingle for projects under active
development, and so we've done work to integrate BZ and Mingle for bugs and put
big, thorny issues such as how we handle edit conflicts in Mingle so they can
be tracked within the team and dealt with with
design/product/engineering/community input.

So, having this in bugzilla feels somewhat wrong for our workflows (we're not
using BZ for tracking complex problems, since the sort of long-form
conversations you need to have don't make sense here), somewhat duplicative
(bugzilla entries are copied over into mingle for bug-tracking, so we now have
two tickets, effectively, covering this problem) and not really aiding in
transparency (BZ is opaque to the community and the devs working on this
problem are participating in the conversations about it elsewhere).

What I'd suggest in this case is closing as..something - Duplicate, maybe? Or
just marking it as lowest-priority and closing it as fixed when we've got edit
conflict behaviour worked out - and pushing design (who are currently working
on EC behaviour, as I understand it) to be transparent about what they're doing
and thinking via mw.org, the design and flow FAQs on enwiki and mw.org, and
invite participation from end users there. Does that make any sense?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to