https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56537
--- Comment #14 from TMg <mr.h...@gmx.de> --- (In reply to comment #13) > This comment probably adds more heat [...] My comments aren't intended to add something. All I'm trying to do is to find honest words for what's already there. > significant cost to Wikimedia community relations [...] Let me put it that way: If you are being criticized for adding non-requested features why are you adding an other non-requested feature that can be criticized for the exact same reasons? It's not that we don't have a Gadget infrastructure. Why does WMF build a separate one that can't be controlled by the communities and calls it "Beta" instead of what it really is? > I think there may be some value in explicitly marking particularly > half-baked ideas or implementations. I think that's more honest. After looking at the actual implementation of the "Typography Update" I hope you are right. This is not even "Beta". I'm afraid deploying such "half-baked ideas" will make things worse, no matter how you call it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
